Background:
Worldwide, L. pneumophila sg 1 is the most common agent of Legionnaires’
disease ( 80 to 90% of the reported cases). In contrast, L. pneumophila
sg 2–14 account for only 15 to 20% of community-acquired cases,
although they account for over 50% of the environmental isolates.
The discrepancy between environmental isolates and clinical cases
of disease suggested that there are differences in virulence. We
decided to subtype the environmental Legionella strains isolated
from health care facilities (HCFs) and to compare the distribution
of strains with the occurrence of hospital-acquired legionellosis.
Methods:
Observational ecological study based on the data provided by the
regional surveillance of legionellosis and on data obtained from
hospitals environmental monitoring. Using the monoclonal antibody
MAb 3/1 of the Dresden Panel we collected and typed environmental
strains of L. pneumophila sg 1 obtained during routine testing in
56 health care facilities from 2004 to 2009. The results of the
laboratory analyses of the environmental samples were compared with
the number of cases that each health care facility reported during
the study period.
Results:The
association between the type of colonisation (L. pneumophila sg
1 vs others serogroups) and the incidence of reported cases was
statistically significant (p = 0.03 according to the ?2 test). Legionella
strains with the virulence–associated epitope recognised by
MAb 3/1 were isolated in 8 of the 26 HCFs colonised by L. pneumophila
sg 1; 7 of the HCFs colonised by MAb 3/1-positive strains accounted
for 85% of the cases of hospital-acquired legionellosis reported
during the 6-year study period. There was a statistically significant
association (p = 0.003) between the presence of cases and colonisation
by MAb 3/1-positive Legionella strains.
Conclusion:This
study suggests that hospitals colonised by more virulent strains should
be aware of the increased risk and consider the opportunities of increase
their monitoring efforts and implement more effective contamination
control strategies.