Environmental
investigations aimed at verifying the effectiveness of sanitation
and disinfection procedures
Background:
Evidence to date indicates that heater–cooler units (HCUs)
and heater units (HUs) can generate potentially infectious aerosols
containing a range of opportunistic pathogens such as Mycobacterium
chimaera, other non-tuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) species,
Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Legionella spp. Our purpose was to
determine the extent of Legionella contamination and total viable
count (TVC) in HCUs and HUs and to analyze the relationship
by water system design of devices of two different brands (LivaNova
vs. Maquet).
Methods:
Legionella
spp. were detected and quantified by our optimized PMA-qPCR
protocol; TVCs were assessed according to ISO protocol 6222.
Analyses were performed in the first sampling round and after
six months of surveillance.
Results:
Overall, Legionella spp. was detected in 65.7% of devices. In
the second sampling round, Legionella positivity rates were
significantly lower in water samples from the Maquet devices
compared to the LivaNova ones (27.3% vs. 61.5%). LivaNova HCUs
also yielded more Legionella, and aquatic bacteria counts than
Maquet in both first and second-round samples.
Conclusions: We recommend that
all surgical patients and staff exposed to aerosols from thermoregulatory
devices should be followed up for Legionella infection and that
microbiological surveillance on such devices should be conducted
regularly as precautionary principle.
Failure
to eradicate non-tuberculous mycobacteria upon disinfection of heater-cooler
units: results of a microbiological investigation in northwestern
Italy.
Savina Ditommaso, Monica Giacomuzzi, Gabriele Memoli, Carla M
Zotti. J Hosp Infect. 2020 Nov;106(3):585-593.
Background:
Heater–cooler units (HCUs) used during cardiopulmonary bypass
may become colonized with non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), including
Mycobacterium chimaera. Recently, a worldwide investigation conducted
in hospitalized infected patients has detected M. chimaera in several
Stockert 3T HCUs manufactured by LivaNova.
Aim:
Microbiological surveillance on Stockert 3T (LivaNova) and Maquet
HCU40 (Getinge) devices as well as an evaluation of the efficacy
of their recommended decontamination protocols.
Methods:
A total of 308 water samples were collected from 29 HCUs: 264 samples
were collected from 17 Stockert 3T HCUs and 44 samples from 12 Maquet
HCU40 devices. Samples were tested for total viable counts (TVCs)
at both 22 and 36°C, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, coliform bacteria,
and NTM. The microbiological surveillance began in June 2017 and
ran until October 2019.
Findings:
A total of 308 HCU water samples were analysed, 65.5% of which yielded
NTM. The most frequently colonized device with NTM was the Stockert
3T (88.2%), with a frequency of positive samples of 59.5% (157/264).
The Maquet HCU40 devices less frequently yielded NTM (33.3%), with
a frequency of positive water samples of 13.6% (6/44). Disinfection
procedures were effective in reducing TVCs of bacteria with the
exception of NTM species. NTM were detected in both pre-disinfection
(50.1%) and post-disinfection (55.7%) samples, and no significant
association was found between disinfection and NTM results both
in Stockert 3T and Maquet HCU40 devices.
Conclusion:
This study suggests that manufacturers' procedures for disinfection
are ineffective and/or inadequate. Until effective disinfection
protocols become available, the only way to minimize the risk of
NTM contamination is to closely monitor the water quality in the
HCU, keep it as clean as possible, and treat it like any other biohazardous
material.
Disinfection
and sterilization are needed for guaranteeing that medical and surgical
instruments do not spread contagious microorganisms to patients.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a simple manual
technique of high-level disinfection (HLD) of flexible fiberoptic
nasofibroscopes (FFNs) with wipes impregnated with a chlorine dioxide
solution (Tristel Trio Wipes System—TTW) against a conventional
automated washer machine (Soluscope ENT, Cimrex 12—AW). FFNs
used in 62 patients undergoing endoscopy at an ENT clinic were sampled
according to an aseptic procedure. For each nasoendoscopy, microbiological
samples were taken at two times: (1) after a patient’s nasoendoscopy
and (2) immediately after high-level disinfection. Ten microliters
of each prepared sample were inoculated onto specific culture media
for the detection of nasopharyngeal flora microorganisms. The microbiological
results obtained from 62 post-disinfection samples revealed bacterial
growth on two FFNs disinfected with AW, and five FFNs disinfected
with TTW, but this difference is not statistically significant.
None of the isolates were pathogenic bacteria. Our results are different
than the results obtained by two previously published studies on
the TTW system. In both studies, sampling was carried out by swabbing
the tip and the handle surface of FFNs. This sampling method was
the least effective method means of detecting bacteria on a surface.
It can be concluded that the two disinfection systems allow providers
to obtain a reduction of the saprophytic and pathogenic microbial
load.
Dental
unit waterlines (DUWLs) can be considered one of the possible routes
of H. pylori transmission, although its presence in DUWLs has not
yet been investigated thoroughly. The present study aimed to discover
the prevalence of H. pylori and oral streptococci (S. oralis and
S. mutans) in DUWLs to evaluate the risk of exposure to human pathogens
in dental practices. We collected the output water from 60 dental
chair units (DCUs) in 26 private dentistry settings in Turin, searching
for H. pylori and oral streptococci (OS) DNA, with a polymerase
chain reaction (PCR) technique. At the same time, dentists completed
a questionnaire about their DCUs, their main activities, the presence
of anti-retraction devices, their attitudes about disinfection,
etc. No dental chair unit tested was contaminated with H. pylori
or S. mutans; only one dental chair was contaminated with S. oralis
(1.7%). Considering the results, we can state that: (i) the lack
of H. pylori DNA in water samples analyzed, suggests that municipal
water is presumably treated with a sufficient chlorine level to
inactivate DNA over time; (ii) the aspiration of oral fluids is
limited by anti-retraction valves fitted distally to hand pieces;
(iii) propidium monoazide qPCR (PMA-qPCR) could be a good technique
to investigate and monitor potential environmental sources of infections
such as DUWLs.
Pseudomonas
aeruginosa is an environmental bacterium, ubiquitous in aquatic
habitats and water distribution systems, including dental unit waterlines
(DUWLs). We investigated the prevalence of P. aeruginosa in DUWLs
from private dental settings. We also analyzed the relationship
between P. aeruginosa contamination and the presence of Legionella
spp. and total viable count (TVC) in order to suggest a simple and
inexpensive protocol to test the quality of water from DUWLs. We
detected and quantified P. aeruginosa both by culture and by a PMA
(propidium monoazide)-qPCR method. Overall, we detected P. aeruginosa
in 17 samples using the PMA-qPCR and in 11 samples using the culture.
All culture-positive samples were positive with the PMA-qPCR too,
with an agreement between the two methods of 93% and a Cohen's kappa
coefficient of ? = 0.747 (good concordance). Comparing results with
results of our previous study, we noted that (a) P. aeruginosa was
isolated only from DUWLs with high TVC and (b) five out of six Legionella-positive
samples were negative for Pseudomonas spp. Our final suggestion
is that the cleanliness of DUWLs should be assessed by TVC because
it is a good indicator of the presence of pathogens such as Legionella
spp. and P. aeruginosa.
Objective:
To assess the efficacy of an alternative disinfection method for
hospital water distribution systems contaminated with Legionella.
Methods:
Disinfection with peracetic acid was performed in a small hospital
contaminated with L. pneumophila serotype 1. The disinfectant was
used at concentrations of 50 ppm (first three surveillance phases)
and 1,000 ppm (fourth surveillance phase) for 30 minutes.
Results:
Environmental monitoring revealed that disinfection was maintained
1 week after treatment; however, levels of recontamination surpassing
baseline values were detected after approximately 1 month. Comparison
of water temperatures measured at the distal outlets showed a statistically
significant association between temperature and bacterial load.
The circulating water temperature was found to be lower in the two
wards farthest away from the hot water production plant than in
other wards. It was thought that the lower water temperature in
the two wards promoted the bacterial growth even after disinfection.
Conclusion:
Peracetic acid may be useful in emergency situations, but does not
provide definitive protection even if used monthly.
|