Accertamento diretto

Persistence of Legionella in Routinely Disinfected Heater-Cooler Units and Heater Units assessed by Propidium Monoazide qPCR. Savina Ditommaso, Monica Giacomuzzi, Gabriele Memoli, Jacopo Garlasco, Carla M Zotti. Pathogens. 2020 Nov 23;9(11):978.

Background: Evidence to date indicates that heater–cooler units (HCUs) and heater units (HUs) can generate potentially infectious aerosols containing a range of opportunistic pathogens such as Mycobacterium chimaera, other non-tuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) species, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Legionella spp. Our purpose was to determine the extent of Legionella contamination and total viable count (TVC) in HCUs and HUs and to analyze the relationship by water system design of devices of two different brands (LivaNova vs. Maquet).

Methods: Legionella spp. were detected and quantified by our optimized PMA-qPCR protocol; TVCs were assessed according to ISO protocol 6222. Analyses were performed in the first sampling round and after six months of surveillance.

Results: Overall, Legionella spp. was detected in 65.7% of devices. In the second sampling round, Legionella positivity rates were significantly lower in water samples from the Maquet devices compared to the LivaNova ones (27.3% vs. 61.5%). LivaNova HCUs also yielded more Legionella, and aquatic bacteria counts than Maquet in both first and second-round samples.

Conclusions: We recommend that all surgical patients and staff exposed to aerosols from thermoregulatory devices should be followed up for Legionella infection and that microbiological surveillance on such devices should be conducted regularly as precautionary principle.

Background: Heater–cooler units (HCUs) used during cardiopulmonary bypass may become colonized with non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), including Mycobacterium chimaera. Recently, a worldwide investigation conducted in hospitalized infected patients has detected M. chimaera in several Stockert 3T HCUs manufactured by LivaNova.

Aim: Microbiological surveillance on Stockert 3T (LivaNova) and Maquet HCU40 (Getinge) devices as well as an evaluation of the efficacy of their recommended decontamination protocols.

Methods: A total of 308 water samples were collected from 29 HCUs: 264 samples were collected from 17 Stockert 3T HCUs and 44 samples from 12 Maquet HCU40 devices. Samples were tested for total viable counts (TVCs) at both 22 and 36°C, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, coliform bacteria, and NTM. The microbiological surveillance began in June 2017 and ran until October 2019.

Findings: A total of 308 HCU water samples were analysed, 65.5% of which yielded NTM. The most frequently colonized device with NTM was the Stockert 3T (88.2%), with a frequency of positive samples of 59.5% (157/264). The Maquet HCU40 devices less frequently yielded NTM (33.3%), with a frequency of positive water samples of 13.6% (6/44). Disinfection procedures were effective in reducing TVCs of bacteria with the exception of NTM species. NTM were detected in both pre-disinfection (50.1%) and post-disinfection (55.7%) samples, and no significant association was found between disinfection and NTM results both in Stockert 3T and Maquet HCU40 devices.

Conclusion: This study suggests that manufacturers' procedures for disinfection are ineffective and/or inadequate. Until effective disinfection protocols become available, the only way to minimize the risk of NTM contamination is to closely monitor the water quality in the HCU, keep it as clean as possible, and treat it like any other biohazardous material.

Disinfection and sterilization are needed for guaranteeing that medical and surgical instruments do not spread contagious microorganisms to patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a simple manual technique of high-level disinfection (HLD) of flexible fiberoptic nasofibroscopes (FFNs) with wipes impregnated with a chlorine dioxide solution (Tristel Trio Wipes System—TTW) against a conventional automated washer machine (Soluscope ENT, Cimrex 12—AW). FFNs used in 62 patients undergoing endoscopy at an ENT clinic were sampled according to an aseptic procedure. For each nasoendoscopy, microbiological samples were taken at two times: (1) after a patient’s nasoendoscopy and (2) immediately after high-level disinfection. Ten microliters of each prepared sample were inoculated onto specific culture media for the detection of nasopharyngeal flora microorganisms. The microbiological results obtained from 62 post-disinfection samples revealed bacterial growth on two FFNs disinfected with AW, and five FFNs disinfected with TTW, but this difference is not statistically significant. None of the isolates were pathogenic bacteria. Our results are different than the results obtained by two previously published studies on the TTW system. In both studies, sampling was carried out by swabbing the tip and the handle surface of FFNs. This sampling method was the least effective method means of detecting bacteria on a surface. It can be concluded that the two disinfection systems allow providers to obtain a reduction of the saprophytic and pathogenic microbial load.

Dental unit waterlines (DUWLs) can be considered one of the possible routes of H. pylori transmission, although its presence in DUWLs has not yet been investigated thoroughly. The present study aimed to discover the prevalence of H. pylori and oral streptococci (S. oralis and S. mutans) in DUWLs to evaluate the risk of exposure to human pathogens in dental practices. We collected the output water from 60 dental chair units (DCUs) in 26 private dentistry settings in Turin, searching for H. pylori and oral streptococci (OS) DNA, with a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique. At the same time, dentists completed a questionnaire about their DCUs, their main activities, the presence of anti-retraction devices, their attitudes about disinfection, etc. No dental chair unit tested was contaminated with H. pylori or S. mutans; only one dental chair was contaminated with S. oralis (1.7%). Considering the results, we can state that: (i) the lack of H. pylori DNA in water samples analyzed, suggests that municipal water is presumably treated with a sufficient chlorine level to inactivate DNA over time; (ii) the aspiration of oral fluids is limited by anti-retraction valves fitted distally to hand pieces; (iii) propidium monoazide qPCR (PMA-qPCR) could be a good technique to investigate and monitor potential environmental sources of infections such as DUWLs.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an environmental bacterium, ubiquitous in aquatic habitats and water distribution systems, including dental unit waterlines (DUWLs). We investigated the prevalence of P. aeruginosa in DUWLs from private dental settings. We also analyzed the relationship between P. aeruginosa contamination and the presence of Legionella spp. and total viable count (TVC) in order to suggest a simple and inexpensive protocol to test the quality of water from DUWLs. We detected and quantified P. aeruginosa both by culture and by a PMA (propidium monoazide)-qPCR method. Overall, we detected P. aeruginosa in 17 samples using the PMA-qPCR and in 11 samples using the culture. All culture-positive samples were positive with the PMA-qPCR too, with an agreement between the two methods of 93% and a Cohen's kappa coefficient of ? = 0.747 (good concordance). Comparing results with results of our previous study, we noted that (a) P. aeruginosa was isolated only from DUWLs with high TVC and (b) five out of six Legionella-positive samples were negative for Pseudomonas spp. Our final suggestion is that the cleanliness of DUWLs should be assessed by TVC because it is a good indicator of the presence of pathogens such as Legionella spp. and P. aeruginosa.

Objective: To assess the efficacy of an alternative disinfection method for hospital water distribution systems contaminated with Legionella.

Methods: Disinfection with peracetic acid was performed in a small hospital contaminated with L. pneumophila serotype 1. The disinfectant was used at concentrations of 50 ppm (first three surveillance phases) and 1,000 ppm (fourth surveillance phase) for 30 minutes.

Results: Environmental monitoring revealed that disinfection was maintained 1 week after treatment; however, levels of recontamination surpassing baseline values were detected after approximately 1 month. Comparison of water temperatures measured at the distal outlets showed a statistically significant association between temperature and bacterial load. The circulating water temperature was found to be lower in the two wards farthest away from the hot water production plant than in other wards. It was thought that the lower water temperature in the two wards promoted the bacterial growth even after disinfection.

Conclusion: Peracetic acid may be useful in emergency situations, but does not provide definitive protection even if used monthly.